Sharing Custody with an Abuser
The notion that shared custody with a documented abuser is an act of protection is nothing more than a desperate concession from a protective parent faced with an impossible choice: lose your children entirely or share custody with an abuser. This is the grim reality that countless protective parents endure due to a family court system that operates like a child trafficking network, perpetuating a cycle of abuse. What we see here is no less than a criminal enterprise—a systemic failure channeling federal funds under Titles IV-D and IV-E, masquerading as child welfare while reinforcing false allegations against protective parents.
The public needs to understand that this conveyor belt process within family courts across the nation is systematically transferring children from protective parents to abusers. It does so under the guise of “parental alienation,” a concept grounded in the discredited theories of Richard Gardner, which disturbingly argue that children are inherently sexual beings. Gardner’s ideas are rooted in white nationalist beliefs, asserting that children must be “sexualized” to benefit a certain demographic. His distorted philosophy continues to poison family court proceedings, transforming “parental alienation” into a weapon against protective parents.
50/50 Custody: A Loaded Gun Forced into Signing
Today’s “50/50 custody” system is a trap, forced upon protective parents under threat of severe consequences if they refuse. It allows judges to exercise broad discretion, often suppressing evidence of abuse under gag orders. Evidence that should protect children is dismissed in favor of a pre-packaged outcome, with assets redistributed in favor of whoever filed first. Parental alienation has become the court’s gold standard, overruling decades of medical and psychiatric research. The very foundation of the family court, which once sought the child’s best interests, has deteriorated into an industry driven by ideology rather than facts.
Twisting Childhood Development into a Tool for Abuse
Gardner’s twisted theories reduce childhood biology to a grotesque misinterpretation. His claim that infants are sexual beings capable of orgasm is not only unsubstantiated but also dangerous. Biological responses, like infant erections, are misconstrued as proof that children “desire” adult attention. Gardner’s theories give license to abusers, reframing abuse as a “natural” part of childhood and invalidating legitimate medical science. His ideology supports a lucrative industry built around defending abusers by denying that sexual abuse of children within the family context exists at all, under the guise of parental alienation. Criminal prosecutions that would be inevitable if these cases involved strangers rather than family members are dealt with by denying the allegations based on the assumption that any charges presented in the context of custody litigation are false and meant to seek a manipulative advantage on the part of the abuser.
This position of blanket denial and blocking of evidence of crimes has been and continues to be a cause of unconscionable suffering of children isolated in the custody of abusers . Suffering, dismantling of the psyche’s and character development of children correlates with deterioration in physical and emotional healthy development as children are raised in an atmosphere of ongoing induced trauma. Never have so many children been forced into mental health /psychiatric treatment requiring psychopharmacological intervention with antidepressants, anxiolytics and antipsychotic medications.
The reporting of children committing suicide or murdering siblings and or abuser parents is a statistic that appears in random news reports of horrifying crimes. Shocking crimes of murder are not properly reported as to the roots of these crimes in actions of family abuse selectively, ignored, covered up by authorities because of the liability that would have and should have been acted upon by criminal and child protective service agencies as well as hospitals – psychiatric and medical who are taking reports from children and are witnesses to the abuse that they can document, medically as having occurred.
The alternate outcomes of children forced into the court ordered isolation of abusers as per a false narrative of parental alienation driven by a hidden/secretive agenda of massive financial gain across many thresholds dealing with family court Legal representation is that children who are forced to identify with their abusers become the abusers that Protective Parents fled for their own and their children’s protection.
Children who are involved in abuse of their siblings, their pets, school mate bullying and cruelty to peers…… gun violence, must be viewed as casualties of the Gardner concept of parental alienation/denial of incest and sexual abuse of children driven by financial incentive. Gardner himself succumbed to the unanticipated depth and breadth of horrors his theories unleashed as Gardner himself succumbed to his own guilt by delivering a rageful assault on himself. His death by painful self inflicted knife wounds to his body must be viewed as a statement of guilt. As an MD Gardner could have committed suicide by medication and his death would have / could have escaped notice.
The painful, unconscionable suffering of children isolated in the custody of abusers by family court officers, ‘”protected” by so called immunity are not immune from acts of fraud, judicial abuse of process, violation of civil right, engagement in coercion. Intimidation in the course of suppressing the presence of evidence are actions federally prosecutable. Participants in the criminal enterprise of child trafficking whose criminal acts are “secreted” in plain sight must not be allowed to hide behind the smoke and mirrors of the lies and larceny of family court practitioners.
Economic Exploitation of Protective Parents
Protective parents who lose custody face devastating consequences. They lose their children, financial stability, and dignity, becoming ensnared in a system that burdens them with impossible child support obligations while being vilified in court. Courts today are geared towards transferring children to abusers, an outcome incentivized by state interests benefiting financially from the concept of parental alienation. The funding derived from these policies— originally intended to support vulnerable populations—now fuels a profit machine that thrives on exploiting the lives of the most defenseless. Family courts have become ground zero for institutionalized child trafficking, concealed behind a smokescreen of bureaucratic jargon and policy.
Parental Alienation: The “Flat Earth” Theory of Family Courts
Parental alienation has morphed into a catch-all, a theoretical crutch that supports manufactured evidence and fabricated reports. This pseudo-science pressures children to adapt to their abusers, forcing them to deny their trauma to survive. Children are conditioned to accept physical and emotional abuse, starvation, and constant vigilance, paying a profound psychological price. Their anger, despair, and sense of betrayal eventually fracture their relationship with the protective parent. This hostility, compounded by guilt, tears children apart, trapping them in an emotional torment inflicted by a court system meant to protect them.
This isn’t just a legal issue, it’s a moral crisis. The public, protective parents, and professionals must recognize the grim reality of what “custody” has become: a profit-driven, trauma-inducing machine operating at the expense of innocent lives. The status quo demands dismantling if we are ever to protect children from abuse, rather than handing them to it.
