The archives of the genocidal atrocities being generated by family court justices exist in the transcripts of court proceedings. The FCVFC will be elucidating the patterns of judicial abuse, personal prejudice, and criminality by quoting the words of judges during official legal proceedings.
Often, court proceedings are mind-numbing due to the shame and humiliation experienced by litigants fighting for their children’s lives and their own. Constitutional violations of due process and procedural technical abuse are typically beyond the reach of most litigants.
Lawyers who appear before judges, where the unspoken message is to comply with the directives of the court and adhere to the discredited protocol of Richard Gardner, M.D., regarding “parental alienation” and questionable “therapeutic” procedures, do so to preserve their chances of success. These practices have skewed the outcomes of high-conflict cases involving accusations of child abuse.
Lawyers representing clients often tell them, “You cannot say that because it will offend the judge.” Omitting critical evidence and failing to address key issues in ways that are not obvious to the client have become common practices in family court. This system is not governed by the strict rules of procedure and statutes that exist in criminal court.
Judges are given both immunity and discretion, supposedly to protect them from being penalized for honest mistakes made in the execution of their duties. These protections are not meant to shield actions based on personal bias, prejudice, or decisions driven by financial incentives. While it is understandable that judges will sometimes make difficult decisions in emotionally charged cases, the abuse of power, especially when it causes harm, cannot be excused.
In formal complaints to oversight bodies, appeals, or legal filings, constitutional and technical legal language often fails to capture the true nature of the proceedings. These include bias, cruelty, and the intentional manipulation of power to force specific outcomes. The legal process sometimes conceals the inhumanity and vindictiveness present in these courtrooms.
In my own early conflicts with the New Jersey courts, which began during my volunteer advocacy for a child and family seeking safety from a brutal abuser, I personally experienced coercion by the Attorney General. Her statement on the record was:
“You either sign this document admitting guilt, as defined by my office, or you will not return home to pick up your daughter at school.”
I signed the document.
I then promptly filed a federal lawsuit against every lawyer and law firm that had represented me, along with the judge and the New Jersey Attorney General who presided over the hearing.
With the benefit of hindsight and many years to reflect, I have witnessed how often judges’ words, preserved in official transcripts, reveal their corruption, hatred for those who challenge their authority, and total disregard for justice. The time has come to publish these statements. These words, sealed in transcripts of closed cases, reflect a judicial legacy that sacrificed children’s lives and permanently altered the lives of those who loved them.
Moving forward, statements that expose the cruelty, lawlessness, and abuse of power by a generation of judges obsessed with control and privilege will be made public. Our intent is to hold every individual accountable.
