Primal passions understood and canonized by the Greek classics in the family dramas of Electra and Medea are illustrative of the depth and breadth of perversion and depravity that exist within the family unit. Matricide, patricide, allegiances, and revenge for the murder of siblings capture the passions and power over life and death within the family unit. The consequences of depravity, abuse, and murder within the family unit have ripple effects through time and space, cultural mores, and the social contract that seeks to manage equity within the social order.
The themes expressed in iconic literature are compressed into the shorthand retribution monetized in family courts across the USA under the phrase, parental alienation. Equally synonymous with perversion and depravity………Richard Gardner MD’s “parental alienation” phrase/verb, has succeeded with the assistance of a marketing company, to upend strictures against incest, child torture, and murders within the family system. Courts across the USA have weaponized, systematized, and created an industrialized factory slaughter house cottage industry using the debunked, anti-scientific theory that has captured the imagination with the action phrase parental alienation. The family court system across the USA has become an industrialized system of family annihilation and social order deconstruction.
The clever phrase parental alienation captures, accurately a venal dynamic, the Gardner concept/poison pill undermines the complex interpersonal/underlying pathological dynamic of parental alienation as it satisfies the family court demand for slick, quick, and easy courtroom defenses
Parental Alienation is the shorthand form that expresses rage, revenge, based on murderous, smoldering hatred, resolving in actions enacted by courts that have monetized parental dastardly acts of abuse of children. Playing parent against child /demonizing children/defining the protective parent as the abuser and creating custody transfer of children from the protection of one parent to the isolation and continued abuse of the other parent as a financial windfall for lawyers and their minions, state coffers via government agencies involved in child support enforcement, insanity has become the law of the land.
THE SILENCE INDUCED BY FEAR OF FIGHTING THE FAMILY COURTS, INDUCED BY THREATS AND INTIMIDATION OF THE COORDINATED EFFORTS OF COURT ACTORS IS DEAFENING AND GENOCIDAL AS TO SOCIAL IMPACT.
The Expert Psychologists and Forensic Psychiatrists associated with the FCVFC are deeply interested in studying a cross-section of custody litigation cases that involve predatory, hostile retaliatory action against a parent partner perceived to have abandoned the relationship. Punishment for abandonment is met with seeking retaliation against the abandoning parent by punishing the children of the relationship.
These cases involve action taken to punish the abandoning partner by exerting destructive action against the children of the relationship, knowing that this action will cause the greatest amount of suffering to their partner. The vehicle for separating the children may involve false allegations of parental alienation, hurled by the actual abuser against the actual Protective Parent. The actual Protective Parent then becomes entangled/immobilized in the effort to respond to false allegations without the benefit of constitutional court process protections because family court judges are allowed to interject directives based on “judicial discretion” ,,, assumed – presumed intimate, confidential knowledge of the case. Without the process of documented, transparent discovery the factual basis for false allegations can gain traction and the position of “truth” within the legal context. Critical facts omitted lay the groundwork for ongoing unmitigated abuse and neglect to go uninterrupted “Under Color Of Law”.
The cases of which the FCVFC are aware and have been asked to study include cases in which a parent partner has murdered children in front of their partner or forced the partner into severely pathological, abusive subordination of the abuser parent/partner. Submission is rationalized on the basis/hope that children would not be subject to abuse. The rationalization meant to protect or buy time inevitably collapses and the suffering and damage that occurs is incalculable. Ultimately, when the Protective Parent partner takes action to leave, false allegations to police and courts follow as the “dominant” partner seeks revenge for the defiance and authority challenge.
We can say that the presenting stigmata of coercive control, threats, intimidation, child neglect, and levels of abuse are present and require full study and documentation. Officers of the court must be held accountable for the harm that comes to Protective Parents vilified as abusers and child victims labeled as liars or subjects of “brainwashing”. The projective defenses of the abuser lodged against the defender parent tend to be compelling because the abuser has full consciousness of their acts and motivations.
Judicial engagement in fulfilling the budget largess that flows to participants in litigation as well as the cash flow that comes from participating in the transfer of Federal funds to the states via Title IV D and Title IV E -( aid to needy and dependant children, defining the abuser as the protective parent and the Protective Parent as the abuser ) has evolved to outweigh any and all “Best Interest” of the child standard. We assert that court actors know exactly what they are doing and why and that after more than fifty years of the Gardner concept of parental alienation taking over the court custody process, there are no naive actors in the mix.
As needed we can supply a list of adjudicated cases of familicide and documented severe neglect and abuse where the dynamic of partner punishment using the children as the source of inflicting pain was documented beyond a reasonable doubt.
It is for this reason that an informed body of court litigation participants and consumers of legal services must be active in conducting strict scrutiny and careful evaluation of the legal process unfolding before them, engulfing their lives.
