American Courts Across the USA Eat Their Young
Judges must be held accountable for the suffering and death of children transferred by darvo demands for engagement with documented abusers. Darvo is the acronym that codifies the action positions of battle tactics used by aggressors to overwhelm and overpower the objects of their assault. Specifically, (Darvo – deny – attack reverse – victim and offender) is an aggressive tactic used by lawyers who are empowered by law to lie in the service of seeking the truth as well as by those who seek an advantage to overpower, displace, deregulate and dismantle their adversary. Litigation is an adversarial process. Darvo is deployed to dismantle the truth is a crime.
The current family court judicial process demands that children meet with, deal with, explain themselves to court appointed factually inexperienced incompetent, unqualified, court appointed factotum appointed as “custody evaluators” in the form of court appointed guardian ad litem is an insult to scientific, medical, legal expertise, much less to the absolute ethical standard that should enshrine the authority to protect children. The so called experts and appointed legal counsel with an unspoken agenda are being placed by family court judges for the implementation of an unspoken outcome, namely, transfer of federal funds to the states under title iv d and title iv e, aid to dependant children .
This once worthy program was designed to pay for services to protect vulnerable children and to support safe homes. By the process of redefinition and assignment of the positions of protective parent and abuser a different agenda is being imposed that has implications for the wider democracy. Evidence suppressed and subverted as to the violence and multiple abuses being enacted via the presence of lawyers under the directive of judges effectively sanitizes and seals the fates of citizens seeking legitimate legal process
The modification of court processes implemented by the marketing/advertising ploy implemented by an advertising firm retained by Dr. Richard Gardner, M.D., was meant to promote his forensic practice defending men accused of incest crimes. The “Gardner model” has evolved to promote the concept of parental alienation, a conceptual construct marketed by forensic psychiatrist Richard Gardner, M.D. as of about 1977 through his marketing firm Creative Therapeutics, Inc. The advocacy for this concept weaponized the defense of probable cause deniability related to child sexual abuse. This concept was subsequently advanced by the marketing campaigns of bar associations across the U.S.A. as of the mid 1980’s.
The denial of the existence of child sexual abuse, flexed by the insinuation that all claims of abuse were entered by an embittered spouse, seeking financial advantage via false claims, altered the course of family court litigation in the most scurrilous of ways. The development of the parental alienation/debunked concept generated the entrance of false narratives which ushered into existence an age of child trafficking and the formulation of a family court establishment as a criminal racketeering enterprise.
In the course of custody litigation taking place in courts across the country, cases are being documented via investigation of case records and cash flow investigation that indicate a pattern of tax fraud via transfer of title iv d and title iv e federal funds to the states. Judges are seeking to
inoculate their positions of power and immunity by appointing layer upon layer of lawyers to provide the shroud of legality to expedite devastating orders that will destroy the lives of children and all who love them as the protective parent is disparaged, shamed, threatened, intimidated, slandered and defamed under an avalanche of false allegations barrages of empty, meaningless, fake sound and fury.
Court appointed operatives viewed as incompetent, arrogant, unqualified, by experience and training court are directed to provide fake news to justify illegal, incomprehensible, unjustified directives to transfer children to a subject parent alleged to be dangerous to the lives and welfare of the subject children. Evidence and expert witness testimony of the highest level of scientific credibility is summarily dismissed by arrogant, empty Darvo threats of judges on a pre fixe well known back channel mission not made explicit by the directives of the star chamber court.
The myth that judges are immune from prosecution is disproved by such examples as that set by the ten-year prison sentence of federal judge Michael Maggion of Faulkner County Arkansas (link to article ) – used as an example of justice compelled by journalism …. The untold story that motivated/instigated action against judge Michael Maggio involved the fact that the Faulkner County Family Court operatives mocked a young mother whose two young children were being brutally sexually assaulted by their father, a fact known and documented medically and psychiatrically through the work of the Foundation For Child Victims of the Family Courts (FCVFC). In this family court case, the mother was discredited from defending her children because of her own past personal accusations of sexual abuse by her own father. Her own extremely impoverished family of ten lived in squalor and all of the children were supported by state disability grants that in fact supported the family over the years. She married a predator who abused her and her children.
As known to the FCVFC because of collaboration with legal services in Faulkner County in Arkansas, the following anecdote is presented to shed light into the darkness of family court corruption.
When the young mother went to court to seek protection for her children, the children were removed from psychiatric hospitalization to be returned to the father. The argument used against her was that her own experience of abuse was a projection onto the children and that no such crime was committed by the father. The court stated that she was fabricating the events she brought to court to seek an advantage in the divorce settlement.
Evidence excluded in family court dealing with sexual assault of a minor was admitted to indict a young sexual predator who raped a young boy who then committed suicide. He, the one time victim turned predator/abuser was charged with murder and given a life sentence for his crime. The evidence that was excluded involved facts that the accused was himself a victim and the perpetrators of crimes against him involved family members of the young mother seeking protection for her children.
The story behind the story investigated by the log cabin republican journalists in Arkansas then unraveled multiple other crimes that compelled investigation that provided grounds for criminal charges against Judge Michael Maggio and multiple additional appeals court and family court judges in Faulkner County, Arkansas. Thus, the accountability of one judge impacted the career
courses of multiple federal, appeals and family court judges in Faulkner County, Arkansas and then set a beacon of light and a course of action to clean up the court – a position that has not, unfortunately been enacted to disinfect the putrefaction and infestation of crime without punishment that has overtaken courts across the U.S.A.
There are many more cases of judges and other court operatives held accountable for heinous acts of betrayal of their fiduciary responsibility. Judge Maggio is set as an example of justice delivered as is well known to the FCVFC. The expert forensic work of the FCVFC director as an early participant in the information gathering that led to the removal of one corrupt court operative has served as a template for ongoing forensic investigative exploration. Whistleblower exposure of many other judges and court operatives have not as yet been as productive as would be beneficial but the work continues through the panoply of service provided by the FCVFC.
Exposure of corruption, fraud, child endangerment carried on by the complex work of the FCVFC and the experts engaged in our mission is driven by the absolute, resolute dedication to protect children/protective parents. Further, it is the mission of FCVFC to educate the public and insure the safety and equity of a proposed democratic legal system that operates with integrity and implementation of due process constitutional protections for all parties.
One time attorney/judge Michael Maggio served five years of a ten year federal prison sentence. While he critically harmed many, the pattern of investigation, information and exposure of the methods and means of implementing fraud and criminal child trafficking racketeering is well known to the experts engaged with the pioneering work of the FCVFC.
